ODYBOAT Cruise Flow
Observatory › Data and digital
Data and digital Peer-reviewed journal

A network governance model for cruise destinations

A conceptual paper, not empirically tested, proposes managing cruise flows through network governance built on collaboration and data exchange between port, city and operators.

Smart Cruise Destination: an innovative network governance framework — Carciotti, S.; Marin, A.; Ukovich, W. · PORTUSplus – the Journal of RETE, N. 8 (Special Issue 'Governance in Port City Regions'), RETE Publisher, Venezia, ISSN 2039-6422

WhereConceptual study
Year2019
SourcePORTUSplus – the Journal of RETE, N. 8 (Special Issue 'Governance in Port City Regions'), RETE Publisher, Venezia, ISSN 2039-6422
Strength of methodLimited

Note on the source. This source should be read with caution: it may be funded by the sector, a draft or a thesis, or rely on self-reported or modelled data. See the limitations below.

The question

How can the use of information technology transform port-city governance to manage cruise flows, and what conceptual framework can organise the network of actors in a cruise destination?

The method

Conceptual paper based on a literature review and a collection of good practices (8 European projects, 2005-2020); it proposes a network governance model and the use of a decision support system (DSS), without empirical data. It reports partial results of an ongoing doctoral research project.

What the study finds

8 EU projectson the cruise port–city linkThe paper reviews eight European projects (URBACT, Interreg, Adriatic IPA and H2020 programmes, 2005-2020) on the link between cruise port and city, covering topics from urban regeneration to sustainable passenger mobility and emission cuts.
4 categoriesof governance stakeholdersThe 'Smart Cruise Destination' model proposes four stakeholder categories for governance: civil society, institutions, the natural environment and the smart destination itself. A technology platform for real-time information exchange is described as needed but left for future development.
  • The authors separate 'hard' interventions (physical works such as waterfront regeneration, which take long and need large investment) from 'soft' ones (management and communication choices), and claim, without supporting data, that governance based on services and intangible infrastructure can achieve results comparable to physical works.
  • The authors observe that there is still no system joining up city, port and ship: studies on service personalisation deal with either the urban setting or the ship, not both.
  • In the authors' view, the port-city imbalance stems from the destination's carrying capacity rather than from port size: places of different scale such as Venice and Dubrovnik face the same problems.
  • Among next steps, the authors point to the need to define more clearly which data stakeholders should exchange, and to tackle standards, security and privacy before building the platform.
Why it matters for ports and cities

It proposes tackling cruise pressure on cities through organisational and information tools before new physical works. The key point is that benefits for each actor depend on the quality of collaboration and data exchange between port, city and operators during the few hours of a call.

Limitations

A purely conceptual contribution: the DSS and the platform are neither described nor tested, and the authors present the model as a 'model to think with' rather than an explanatory one. No empirical validation.

Full reference and source

Carciotti, S., Marin, A., Ukovich, W. (2019). Smart Cruise Destination: an innovative network governance framework. PORTUSplus – the Journal of RETE, N. 8 (Special Issue 'Governance in Port City Regions'), RETE Publisher, Venezia, ISSN 2039-6422.

Read the original study ↗

Summary written by the ODYBOAT Observatory in our own words. Tables and figures belong to the authors.